2018 Q4 OKR Planning#148
Conversation
|
|
||
| We try to frame our ongoing work using a process based on quarterly Objectives and Key Results (OKRs). Objectives reflect outcomes that are challenging, but realistic. Results are tangible and measurable. | ||
|
|
||
| ## 2018 Q4 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It will be in the same spreadsheet, so this file should just link to it, so it won't need to be updated. @diasdavid Do you do the change, or should I do a commit on-top?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@vmx that's the intention, actually. Check the flow that happens on js-ipfs land.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In js-ipld land there is not really a flow as it's a one man show. I just put my OKRs into the spreadsheet and that's it.
But it's OK for me to update this file accordingly in two weeks.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In js-ipld land there is not really a flow as it's a one man show.
Not the case :) You have me, @Stebalien, @davidad, @mikeal (who has been spending time doing IPLD things), @zcstarr (who has contributed in the past and can participate in the discussion) and then you have users such as @b5, @pgte, @satazor and others that can give you valuable feedback on the plan for the quarter.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Happy to participate in the discussion, been a little away from the project for a short spell, got wrapped up in finishing up some work stuff, but looking forward to having time again to jump back in again soon and help out.
|
I've updated the spreadsheet linked above with the things I have in mind for Q4. If you'ev any comments or requests, feel free to post them here or just add items there and assign them to yourself. |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #148 +/- ##
=========================================
Coverage ? 82.47%
=========================================
Files ? 1
Lines ? 194
Branches ? 0
=========================================
Hits ? 160
Misses ? 34
Partials ? 0Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
|
@mikeal @Stebalien @momack2 can you review @vmx OKRs? @vmx I guess you didn't get a chance to present them yet, correct? //cc @steverichmond |
|
@diasdavid we (@jbenet, @momack2, @Stebalien, @mikeal) reviewed the OKRs yesterday night. They should be all set for the overall OKR meeting later tonight. |
|
@diasdavid The updated one should've been used, see #170. |
3 participants
Ref: ipfs/team-mgmt#698
@vmx et al, you know the drill :)