Revert "BugFix: controlled vocab values validation"#12342
Merged
stevenwinship merged 1 commit intodevelopfrom Apr 20, 2026
Merged
Revert "BugFix: controlled vocab values validation"#12342stevenwinship merged 1 commit intodevelopfrom
stevenwinship merged 1 commit intodevelopfrom
Conversation
stevenwinship
approved these changes
Apr 20, 2026
|
📦 Pushed preview images as 🚢 See on GHCR. Use by referencing with full name as printed above, mind the registry name. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Reverts #11950
We have to revert the PR, since it broke OAI harvesting when using oai_dc format (which happens to be the most popular OAI format).
It also broke the following 5 tests:
... however, for some strange reason Jenkins tests were not run on this PR since https://jenkins.dataverse.org/job/IQSS-Dataverse-Develop-PR/view/change-requests/job/PR-11950/9/ (i.e., since November, where it passed), and that must be the reason why this was not detected before the PR was merged.
[edit: and that must be the reason why this was not detected before the PR was merged - actually, I'm not 100% about this; vs some scenario where there were in fact more Jenkins runs, but they somehow got deleted - ? Doesn't matter at this point, really]