Defining a parser that has a child parser with a semantic action AND mixing it with another plain child parser that has no semantic action will result in an incomplete parse result, where the former is correctly parsed (thanks to the semantic action's side effect) but latter being empty.
It's because the attribute deduction is implicitly inhibited by using the semantic action, so that the latter parser becomes "invoked but result discarded" component. In this case the lack of the semantic action on the latter child is almost always the user's mistake, simply forgetting to associate the desired semantic action.
Above kind of situation is very common in real-world grammar. We should detect it statically and emit an assertion failure. (Note that users are advised to use omit[...] when the child attribute is truly not needed.)
This is literally not a bug but it should be considered a design failure on the public interface.