2025

[vks2]

hello. Any plans for 2025? thanks much

[memoryfull]

Thanks for your inquiry. Data ingestion is underway. As previously, we plan to release the 2025 data in June-July, 2026.

There were a couple of changes in the raw data format and a minor bug that we need to account for and fix. Thank you for patience. I will leave the issue open for now.

[vks2]

is there a chance to receive additional field - link to clarification part?
example:
<Баланс ОКУД="0710001">

<Актив СумОтч="6838821" СумПрдщ="8221764" СумПрдшв="8303841">

<ВнеОбА СумОтч="6108666" СумПрдщ="7388377" СумПрдшв="7671585">

<ОснСр Пояснения="2.1" СумОтч="4288" СумПрдщ="4253" СумПрдшв="4441"/>

<ФинВлож Пояснения="3.1" СумОтч="5953839" СумПрдщ="7276480" СумПрдшв="7588910"/> "Пояснения" here is the link for clarification pdf part and may be quite interesting info. BTW, no similar things founded in JSONs from bo.nalog.ru

[memoryfull]

My preliminary answer is no: we aim to provide a single flat table as the end result. Archiving and hosting tens of thousands of PDFs with clarifications is something beyond our remit due to resource constraints. @sergey-bondarkov is on this, he may provide more feedback.

On a slightly related note, some firms expand on their reporting lines, e.g. Gazprom detailing its revenue by source:

Handling unstructured data with nesting in clarifications is challenging, so we resort to a trivial aggregation (see the paper):

Since both the naming and the logic behind decoding is not uniform, it is not feasible to include these optional lines in a flat table (and because of that this information is absent in the Rosstat’s CSVs, 2012–2018, and only present in the FNS XMLs, 2019–2023). However, cash flow statements do not articulate if such lines are present and one does not take them into account. This poses a problem since the decoding lines are widely used by larger firms, present in more than 200,000 observations in 2019–2023 with average revenue close to 2 bln rubles. We parse the optional lines present in cash flow statements — to name them we use an x suffix in place of a last digit that a line’s name would have if it was a regular line, e.g. line_411x (in cases where several additional variables were used to detail the same item, we provide the sum of them). We do not do the same for the balance sheet and other parts of a statement (with the exception of changes in equity), since the structure of these are such that optional lines would simply sum up to the value in an item they decode, and inclusion of the sum of them is therefore redundant.