-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
local-related methods should verify that WorkingTree is in use #3018
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. Weβll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Alternatively:
class WorkingTree:
is_working_tree = True
class CleanTree:
@property
def is_working_tree(self):
return self.tree.is_working_tree
class RemoteLOCAL:
def walk_files(self):
assert self.repo.tree.is_working_tree|
Or an another alternative ;) - create a helper to dry it a bit: def is_working_tree(tree):
return isinstance(tree, WorkingTree) or isinstance(getattr(tree, 'tree', None), WorkingTree)More local. |
|
Some notes:
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
π
|
@pared Let's move that note to that ticket, so we don't forget about it. Also, another way to solve would probably to use |
β Have you followed the guidelines in the Contributing to DVC list?
π Check this box if this PR does not require documentation updates, or if it does and you have created a separate PR in dvc.org with such updates (or at least opened an issue about it in that repo). Please link below to your PR (or issue) in the dvc.org repo.
β Have you checked DeepSource, CodeClimate, and other sanity checks below? We consider their findings recommendatory and don't expect everything to be addressed. Please review them carefully and fix those that actually improve code or fix bugs.
Thank you for the contribution - we'll try to review it as soon as possible. π
Related to #2974