Skip to content

Comments

[Snyk] Upgrade com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core from 2.17.2 to 2.18.2#157

Closed
marcoandries wants to merge 1 commit intodevelopfrom
snyk-upgrade-19b59358ca0c9a73a4ed86e86ba59861
Closed

[Snyk] Upgrade com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core from 2.17.2 to 2.18.2#157
marcoandries wants to merge 1 commit intodevelopfrom
snyk-upgrade-19b59358ca0c9a73a4ed86e86ba59861

Conversation

@marcoandries
Copy link
Contributor

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core from 2.17.2 to 2.18.2.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 5 versions ahead of your current version.

  • The recommended version was released 3 months ago.


Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

….18.2

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core from 2.17.2 to 2.18.2.

See this package in maven:
com.fasterxml.jackson.core:jackson-core

See this project in Snyk:
https://app.snyk.io/org/itext/project/898366f5-2573-4e94-afb2-2448eb64176b?utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&page=upgrade-pr
@iText-CI iText-CI assigned iText-CI and unassigned iText-CI Mar 13, 2025
@iText-CI iText-CI assigned iText-CI and unassigned iText-CI Mar 24, 2025
@iText-CI iText-CI assigned iText-CI and unassigned iText-CI Apr 3, 2025
@Eswcvlad
Copy link
Contributor

Eswcvlad commented Apr 3, 2025

Obsolete with the 25.03 release.

@Eswcvlad Eswcvlad closed this Apr 3, 2025
@Eswcvlad Eswcvlad deleted the snyk-upgrade-19b59358ca0c9a73a4ed86e86ba59861 branch April 3, 2025 21:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants