Skip to content

Conversation

@luizvbo
Copy link
Contributor

@luizvbo luizvbo commented Sep 25, 2025

Closes #34

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 25, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 98.09524% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 89.50%. Comparing base (58d9fae) to head (6393b79).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/cli/run/selector.rs 92.30% 2 Missing ⚠️
src/cli/try_repo.rs 98.74% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #797      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   89.33%   89.50%   +0.17%     
==========================================
  Files          59       60       +1     
  Lines       10997    11204     +207     
==========================================
+ Hits         9824    10028     +204     
- Misses       1173     1176       +3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@luizvbo luizvbo marked this pull request as ready for review October 1, 2025 11:48
@j178 j178 changed the title Feat/try repo Implement prek try-repo Oct 1, 2025
@luizvbo
Copy link
Contributor Author

luizvbo commented Oct 1, 2025

@j178, could you re-trigger the cargo test for macos for me? It failed without even starting 🤷

@j178
Copy link
Owner

j178 commented Oct 1, 2025

@luizvbo No worries, github action is down as usual https://www.githubstatus.com/

@luizvbo
Copy link
Contributor Author

luizvbo commented Oct 2, 2025

@j178, fyi the pipeline succeeded

@j178
Copy link
Owner

j178 commented Oct 8, 2025

Thanks for your work on this! I notice there’s some deviation from the original pre-commit try-repo - for example, pre-commit try-repo supports trying a remote repo, but this PR seems to assume the repo must be a local path.

I’m back from vacation and I’ll work on getting this merged soon. Thanks again!

@j178 j178 merged commit 74cb495 into j178:master Oct 10, 2025
18 checks passed
@luizvbo
Copy link
Contributor Author

luizvbo commented Oct 13, 2025

Thanks for the help @j178! I usually work on this during my working hours. In my company, they promote OSS contribution. However, these past days were very busy

@luizvbo luizvbo deleted the feat/try-repo branch October 13, 2025 14:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Implement prek try-repo

2 participants