StatefulRepository with flush method?#1424
Closed
njr-11 wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
Member
Which meeting? Isn't the meeting later today?
I don't know what you're trying to say here, but I'm pretty sure the answer is "no". |
Member
Oh, you wrote "for", not "from". Sorry, misread. |
Member
Author
|
Canceling this PR after agreement on today's Jakarta Data call that stateless repositories are not intended to make updates or have lifecycle methods run outside of a transaction. PR #1429 adds documentation of that restriction. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
For discussion at the Jakarta Data meeting:
Do we need something like this for applications that use a stateful repository to modify a persistence context outside of a transaction?
Without a flush operation, how can the application know that its changes will be persisted vs lost?
The same applies to our TCK tests. In order to make assertions about what went in to the database, we need guarantees that operations we perform will be persisted after a certain point.