mono - chore: upgrading biome, types, and vitest

[jaredwray]

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

• Followed the Contributing and Code of Conduct guidelines.
• Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes/features) with 100% code coverage.

What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)
mono - chore: upgrading biome, types, and vitest

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (f481244) to head (be4006d).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #182   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           10        10           
  Lines         1266      1266           
  Branches       232       232           
=========================================
  Hits          1266      1266           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request updates several development dependencies, including @biomejs/biome, @types/node, and vitest, along with their corresponding lockfile entries. The review feedback suggests pinning these dependencies to exact versions in package.json to ensure toolchain consistency across different environments. Additionally, it is recommended to deduplicate transitive dependencies like tinyexec and tinyglobby that were introduced in multiple versions during the update.