chore: upgrading vitest and biome

[jaredwray]

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

• Followed the Contributing and Code of Conduct guidelines.
• Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes/features) with 100% code coverage.

What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)
chore: upgrading vitest and biome

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (6ed45be) to head (55bacdf).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #439   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            5         5           
  Lines          470       470           
  Branches       105       105           
=========================================
  Hits           470       470           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request updates several development dependencies, including @biomejs/biome to version 2.4.8, and vitest along with its coverage package to version 4.1.1. The pnpm-lock.yaml file has been updated accordingly, which also includes a minor version bump for rollup to 4.60.0 and the addition of picomatch 4.0.4. I have no feedback to provide.