Skip to content

[Brand] Establish design system governance and contribution guidelines #92

@coderabbitai

Description

@coderabbitai

Overview

Create governance model and contribution guidelines for maintaining and evolving the design system.

Current State

  • Design system exists but no governance
  • No process for proposing new components
  • No versioning or changelog
  • No ownership/stewardship defined

Requirements

Governance Structure

  • Define design system team:
    • Design system lead
    • Component maintainers
    • Contributing designers
    • Contributing developers
  • Decision-making process:
    • Component proposal workflow
    • Breaking change approval
    • Deprecation policy
    • Emergency hotfix process
  • Roles and responsibilities:
    • Who can approve changes
    • Who maintains documentation
    • Who does code reviews
    • Who handles support

Contribution Guidelines

  • Component proposal template:
    • Use case and justification
    • Design mockups
    • API proposal
    • Accessibility considerations
    • Dependencies
  • Development workflow:
    • Branch naming conventions
    • PR template for DS changes
    • Code review checklist
    • Testing requirements
  • Documentation standards:
    • Component API docs
    • Usage examples
    • Do's and don'ts
    • Migration guides

Versioning & Releases

  • Semantic versioning:
    • Major: Breaking changes
    • Minor: New components/features
    • Patch: Bug fixes
  • Changelog maintenance:
    • Keep CHANGELOG.md updated
    • Release notes format
    • Migration guides for breaking changes
  • Release process:
    • Automated releases with CI/CD
    • npm package publishing
    • Design asset distribution

Component Lifecycle

  • Maturity stages:
    • Experimental (alpha)
    • Beta (in testing)
    • Stable (production-ready)
    • Deprecated (scheduled removal)
  • Deprecation policy:
    • 6-month deprecation period
    • Clear migration path
    • Console warnings
    • Documentation updates

Quality Standards

  • Code quality gates:
    • TypeScript strict mode
    • 90%+ test coverage
    • Zero accessibility violations
    • Performance budgets met
  • Design review criteria:
    • Brand compliance
    • Accessibility (WCAG AA)
    • Responsive behavior
    • Dark mode support
  • Documentation requirements:
    • API documentation
    • Usage examples
    • Storybook stories
    • Accessibility notes

Support & Communication

  • Communication channels:
    • #design-system Slack channel
    • Design system newsletter
    • Office hours (weekly)
    • GitHub Discussions
  • Support process:
    • Issue triage
    • Bug prioritization
    • Feature request handling
    • Breaking change announcements
  • Feedback loops:
    • Quarterly surveys
    • Usage analytics
    • User interviews
    • Retrospectives

Deliverables

  • Governance documentation (docs/design-system/GOVERNANCE.md)
  • Contribution guide (docs/design-system/CONTRIBUTING.md)
  • Component proposal template
  • Release process documentation
  • Support playbook

Success Criteria

  • Clear ownership and decision-making
  • Smooth contribution process
  • Predictable release cadence
  • High developer satisfaction
  • Consistent quality standards

Priority: MEDIUM

Estimated Effort: 1-2 weeks

Backlink: Related to PR #64

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

No labels
No labels

Type

No type
No fields configured for issues without a type.

Projects

No projects

Milestone

No milestone

Relationships

None yet

Development

No branches or pull requests

Issue actions