Consistently use sandbox for CpsFlowDefinitions #13
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Member
Author
|
@raul-arabaolaza Gentle ping. No rush on this, but just wanted to make sure the first notification didn't slip by. |
Member
|
@raul-arabaolaza needs to be labeled |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
While looking at the test suite for this plugin, I noticed the
CpsFlowDefinitions in the tests don't consistently use the script security sandbox. Using the script security sandbox results in a more realistic environment given that the script security sandbox should always be enabled in production.In this change, I replaced any usages of the deprecated single-argument constructor for
CpsFlowDefinitionwith usages of the non-deprecated two-argument constructor, passing intrueas the second argument in order to always enable the script security sandbox.