New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

prefer-to-have-length does not take `toStrictEqual` into account #411

Closed

JrSchild opened this issue Sep 5, 2019 · 1 comment

Labels

Contributor

JrSchild commented Sep 5, 2019

The prefer-to-length-rule only warns on toBe(n) calls, but not on toStrictEqual(n). Which is pretty much the same.

Can we get support for this?

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

SimenB closed this as completed in

eacb78a

Member

SimenB commented Sep 5, 2019

🎉 This issue has been resolved in version 22.17.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

SimenB added the released label

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment