Skip to content

NOT FOR MERGE: test semver check still flags major breaks#6

Closed
jrakibi wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
06-07-semver-major-beak
Closed

NOT FOR MERGE: test semver check still flags major breaks#6
jrakibi wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
06-07-semver-major-beak

Conversation

@jrakibi

@jrakibi jrakibi commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

No description provided.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🚨 API BREAKING CHANGE DETECTED

To see the changes click details on "Continuous integration / Check (api)" job then expand "Run api" and scroll to the end of the section.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 62bf187de5

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread base58/src/error.rs
}
}

/// Returns the invalid base58 string length (require at least 4 bytes for checksum), if encountered.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Restore removed public checksum accessor

For downstream crates that handle checksum failures programmatically, base58ck::Error::incorrect_checksum() is the only public accessor for the incorrect/expected checksum values; removing it while base58ck remains at version 0.4.0 makes existing callers fail to compile and violates the repository's stated semver policy. Please keep this method or pair the API break with an intentional release/versioning plan.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@jrakibi jrakibi closed this Jul 6, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant