Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Feb 8, 2023. It is now read-only.

Change the artifactId to express the project hosting#6

Closed
FagnerMartinsBrack wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
central-artifactId
Closed

Change the artifactId to express the project hosting#6
FagnerMartinsBrack wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
central-artifactId

Conversation

@FagnerMartinsBrack
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

As specified by Thad Watson here:

Do you own the domain jscookie.org? If not, please read:
http://central.sonatype.org/pages/choosing-your-coordinates.html
You may also choose a groupId that reflects your project hosting, in this case, something like com.github.js-cookie

@FagnerMartinsBrack FagnerMartinsBrack deleted the central-artifactId branch July 25, 2015 12:57
FagnerMartinsBrack added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 25, 2015
jscookie.org domain is not owned by @FagnerMartinsBrack or @carhartl. I
used this package definition at first in hope that, if in the future the
domain is acquired, then there would be no drastic refactor to the
codebase.

As from gh-6, I realized that if Maven Central will not allow the
artifactId to have a domain reference that is not owned by the artifact
owners, then there's no reason to do the same with the package names
throughout the project.
FagnerMartinsBrack added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 25, 2015
used this package definition at first in hope that, if in the future the
domain is acquired, then there would be no drastic refactor to the
codebase.

As from gh-6, I realized that if Maven Central will not allow the
artifactId to have a domain reference that is not owned by the artifact
owners, then there's no reason to do the same with the package names
throughout the project.

Also, if the user sees a package name starting as com.github.jscookie in
some artifact, then he will know exactly where to look for the project.
FagnerMartinsBrack added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 1, 2015
used this package definition at first in hope that, if in the future the
domain is acquired, then there would be no drastic refactor to the
codebase.

As from gh-6, I realized that if Maven Central will not allow the
artifactId to have a domain reference that is not owned by the artifact
owners, then there's no reason to do the same with the package names
throughout the project.

Also, if the user sees a package name starting as com.github.jscookie in
some artifact, then he will know exactly where to look for the project.

Closes gh-7.
FagnerMartinsBrack added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 1, 2015
The jscookie.org domain is not owned by @FagnerMartinsBrack or @carhartl. I
used this package definition at first in hope that, if in the future the
domain is acquired, then there would be no drastic refactor to the
codebase.

As from gh-6, I realized that if Maven Central will not allow the
artifactId to have a domain reference that is not owned by the artifact
owners, then there's no reason to do the same with the package names
throughout the project.

Also, if the user sees a package name starting as com.github.jscookie in
some artifact, then he will know exactly where to look for the project.

Closes gh-7.
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant