Skip to content

Conversation

@BelfordZ
Copy link
Member

@BelfordZ BelfordZ commented May 6, 2021

having seen #146 I put this together as what I think is an extension of @raman-kananovich 's work.

I quite liked his reference loader interface, specfically having a method to test if its 'fetchable' by the particular protocol handler.

The difference is mainly in the interface, but also had to do with cleaning up some initial hacked-together techdebt if you will.

Raman, thank you very mcuh for the PR and taking the time to help get this together!

fixes:

@BelfordZ BelfordZ force-pushed the feat/custom-protocols-alt branch from a140dae to c895169 Compare May 6, 2021 07:25
@BelfordZ BelfordZ added the enhancement New feature or request label May 6, 2021
@BelfordZ BelfordZ requested a review from shanejonas May 6, 2021 07:29
shanejonas
shanejonas previously approved these changes May 6, 2021
@shanejonas
Copy link
Contributor

needs rebase

Add the ability to implement custom protocols easily.
@BelfordZ BelfordZ force-pushed the feat/custom-protocols-alt branch from c895169 to 61ef640 Compare May 10, 2021 21:08
@BelfordZ BelfordZ requested a review from shanejonas May 10, 2021 21:12
@BelfordZ BelfordZ merged commit 61d77e9 into master May 10, 2021
@BelfordZ BelfordZ deleted the feat/custom-protocols-alt branch May 10, 2021 21:25
@BelfordZ
Copy link
Member Author

🎉 This PR is included in version 1.2.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request released

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants