Skip to content

Comparison between linear regression, causal forest, and Bayesian causal forest models for causal inference in the presence of heterogeneous treatment effects : linear and non-linear data

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

juinerurkar/Causal_Project

Repository files navigation

Causal_Project

Comparison between linear regression, causal forest, and Bayesian causal forest models for causal inference in the presence of heterogeneous treatment effects : linear and non-linear data

In research, we often want to make causal claims about the treatment effect on a given population. However, “historically most datasets have been too small to meaningfully explore heterogeneity of treatment effects beyond dividing the sample into a few subgroups” (Wager & Athey, 2015). Furthermore, there is a concern that when looking for heterogeneous treatment effects, subsetting data multiple times may lead to spurious effects. Using simulated data, we will compare how well three different methods estimate the treatment effect given heterogeneous treatment effects in our data. The three methods we chose to examine are linear regression, causal forests and Bayesian causal forests.

Access the full paper at:

https://juinerurkar.com/heterogeneous-treatment-effects-linear-and-non-linear-data/

About

Comparison between linear regression, causal forest, and Bayesian causal forest models for causal inference in the presence of heterogeneous treatment effects : linear and non-linear data

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published

Contributors 2

  •  
  •