fix: strengthen FROZEN boundary stress test semantics#295
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation
Err(EvidenceOSError::Frozen).Description
boundary_transition_from_active_to_frozen_has_no_off_by_one_leakageincrates/evidenceos-core/tests/stress_tests.rsby asserting a second post-freeze charge also returnsErr(EvidenceOSError::Frozen)to validate the N+1 and N+2 semantics.Testing
cargo test -p evidenceos-core --test stress_tests boundary_transition_from_active_to_frozen_has_no_off_by_one_leakage -- --nocapture, observedoverflow_result = Err(Frozen), and the test passed.cargo test --workspacebut the full workspace run did not complete within the environment runtime limits (targeted test coverage was used to validate the change).Codex Task