Fix memory layout generation for struct parameters #251
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
When a struct is passed by value to a native function, we have to set the struct's memory layout in the FunctionDescriptor, not ValueLayout.ADDRESS.
This means we can't use simple strings ("ADDRESS", "JAVA_INT" etc.) to represent the memory layout anymore, because we need to include things like "typeName:T.getMemoryLayout()". So the relevant functions have been changed everywhere to use PartialStatements that maintain the relevant type information.