feat: allow using latest providerId and alter UI display

[tuantran0910]

Closes #4271

📑 Description

When provisioning a provider and sending an alert with an incorrect providerId (one that does not belong to the provisioned provider), the alert gets permanently associated with the wrong provider.

If the same alert is sent again (with partial deduplication) using the correct providerId, it still retains the previously assigned incorrect providerId. We should allow the providerId to be updated to the latest value.

✅ Checks

• My pull request adheres to the code style of this project
• My code requires changes to the documentation
• I have updated the documentation as required
• All the tests have passed

ℹ Additional Information

Here’s a clearer and more polished version of your text:

I have configured alerts to be sent to Keep via a generic webhook endpoint. For the provisioned provider A with ID 123, I decided to add the query parameter ?provider_id=123.

On the Provider page, each provider card was incorrectly displaying the id field instead of the name field. I have updated it to display the name field correctly.

Before

After

Additionally, the spacing between the icon and the provider name was too tight, affecting readability. I have added some spacing for better clarity.

Before

After

[vercel]

@tuantran0910 is attempting to deploy a commit to the KeepHQ Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

[talboren]

@tuantran0910 thank you for the contribution. I have to admit that I'm missing the before/after difference. Can you point me to where can I see the changes? It seems like both are still displaying the id of the provider.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
keep	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Mar 30, 2025 7:00am

[tuantran0910]

Hi @talboren, here is the difference, just rename Id to Name for clarity.

Actually, these are the names of the providers and their IDs are UUID-like string like this :D

[talboren]

LGTM

[tuantran0910]

Thanks @talboren for the approval :D Can you help me to see what happened with the E2E tests. It seems that I don't have permission for those tests right ?

[talboren]

Thanks @talboren for the approval :D Can you help me to see what happened with the E2E tests. It seems that I don't have permission for those tests right ?

I think it has something to do with a change in the e2e workflow we did, which caches and pulls images, and requires some other permissions now. I've re-run it and if it fails again, will fix and merge on Sunday.