Apache 2.0 -> GPL v3

[dekkagaijin]

I've seen way too many unattributed, closed source copies of your work in the past few hours. Adding strong copyleft protections will help nocode impact a wider audience.

[softprops]

Should nocode actually use no licence instead?

[trivikr]

+1 for No License

[jacktuck]

+1 No license pls

[melwil]

I'm not sure this project supports "No License", read the first line of the license:

When you make a creative work (which includes code) …

[jacktuck]

@melwil Oh dear

[LordZane]

I read that as a creative work, such as code, and not a creative work that has to include code. This should qualify as a creative project, so it should be fine

[melwil]

I completely agree, @LordZane. It was funny wording, however.

The funny best part of No License is that once the project has this, we get some additional sugar:

nobody else can use, copy, distribute, or modify your work … Once the work has other contributors (each a copyright holder), “nobody” starts including you.

So not only does nocode deploy nowhere, it can also be used by nobody. A sound win for No License, I would say.

[namoen0301]

Why not WTFPL?