Skip to content

Conversation

@hertschuh
Copy link
Collaborator

Passing works better in some environments.

Passing works better in some environments.
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @hertschuh, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request refines the error handling for jax and jax.experimental.sparse imports within the distributed_embedding_test.py file. Instead of explicitly setting jax and jax_sparse to None when an ImportError occurs, the code now simply uses a pass statement. This adjustment is intended to resolve issues and ensure the test runs more reliably across various environments, preventing potential failures related to the absence or specific configuration of jax.

Highlights

  • Import Error Handling: Modified the except ImportError block for jax and jax.experimental.sparse imports in distributed_embedding_test.py to use pass instead of assigning None to the module variables.
  • Environment Compatibility: This change aims to improve compatibility and functionality in certain environments where jax imports might behave differently, as noted in the PR description.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request aims to fix an issue with optional jax imports in a test file. The change correctly avoids nullifying the jax import if only the jax_sparse import fails. However, it introduces a new issue where jax and jax_sparse will be undefined if their imports fail, potentially leading to NameError exceptions. A more robust approach would be to handle the imports separately to ensure the variables are always defined, even if as None.

@hertschuh hertschuh requested a review from abheesht17 October 15, 2025 18:05
@hertschuh hertschuh merged commit e7cda94 into keras-team:main Oct 15, 2025
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants