Skip to content

Update list_apps description in MCP documentation to clarify it ref…#14

Merged
masnwilliams merged 1 commit intomainfrom
mason/mcp-typo
Jul 21, 2025
Merged

Update list_apps description in MCP documentation to clarify it ref…#14
masnwilliams merged 1 commit intomainfrom
mason/mcp-typo

Conversation

@masnwilliams
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@masnwilliams masnwilliams commented Jul 21, 2025

TL;DR

Corrected a typo in the MCP documentation for the list_apps tool, clarifying its scope.

Why we made these changes

To improve the accuracy and clarity of the MCP documentation, ensuring users understand that list_apps operates within an 'organization' rather than a 'workspace'.

What changed?

  • mcp.mdx: Updated the description for the list_apps tool to specify it lists Kernel apps within an 'organization' instead of a 'workspace'.

Validation

  • Visual inspection of the updated documentation.

…ers to the Kernel organization instead of the workspace.
@masnwilliams masnwilliams requested a review from juecd July 21, 2025 23:03
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@mesa-dot-dev mesa-dot-dev Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What Changed

This PR introduces a small but important documentation correction in mcp.mdx. The description for the list_apps tool has been updated to clarify that it lists applications within an 'organization' rather than a 'workspace'. This change improves the accuracy and clarity of our documentation for developers using this tool.

Risks / Concerns

This is a documentation-only change, so there are no risks involved. Great catch on the terminology – this clarification is a valuable improvement!

1 files reviewed | 0 comments | Review on Mesa | Edit Reviewer Settings

@masnwilliams masnwilliams merged commit b99c4ac into main Jul 21, 2025
2 checks passed
@masnwilliams masnwilliams deleted the mason/mcp-typo branch July 21, 2025 23:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants