Skip to content

Conversation

@CarlosGamero
Copy link
Collaborator

@CarlosGamero CarlosGamero commented Jan 7, 2026

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved initialization handling to ensure proper setup completion before execution.
  • Documentation

    • Minor formatting updates to documentation.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@CarlosGamero CarlosGamero self-assigned this Jan 7, 2026
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 7, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Documentation updates across SNS and SQS README files. The SNS README now demonstrates awaiting init() on the publisher after instantiation, while the SQS README has minor whitespace cleanup between code blocks.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Documentation Updates
packages/sns/README.md, packages/sqs/README.md
SNS: Added await publisher.init() call after publisher instantiation in code example to show proper initialization. SQS: Removed blank line between consumer initialization and subsequent comment.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~5 minutes

Suggested reviewers

  • kibertoad

Poem

🐰 Hop along, dear code we tend,
Init awaits at journey's end,
Whitespace trimmed, so crisp and clean,
The finest docs you've ever seen!
With every line, a step more bright,
Publishing paths done just right! 📚✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1
❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ⚠️ Warning The title 'Triggering release' is vague and does not accurately describe the specific changes made to the codebase. Update the title to specifically describe the changes, such as 'Add publisher.init() await in SNS README' or 'Update documentation examples for SNS and SQS packages'.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fd5d482 and d8d5ac8.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • packages/sns/README.md
  • packages/sqs/README.md
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • packages/sqs/README.md
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (20)
  • GitHub Check: general (20.x, @message-queue-toolkit/s3-payload-store) / build
  • GitHub Check: general (22.x, @message-queue-toolkit/core) / build
  • GitHub Check: general (24.x, @message-queue-toolkit/amqp) / build
  • GitHub Check: general (20.x, @message-queue-toolkit/gcp-pubsub) / build
  • GitHub Check: general (24.x, @message-queue-toolkit/gcs-payload-store) / build
  • GitHub Check: general (20.x, @message-queue-toolkit/gcs-payload-store) / build
  • GitHub Check: general (22.x, @message-queue-toolkit/amqp) / build
  • GitHub Check: general (24.x, @message-queue-toolkit/sns) / build
  • GitHub Check: general (24.x, @message-queue-toolkit/gcp-pubsub) / build
  • GitHub Check: general (24.x, @message-queue-toolkit/schemas) / build
  • GitHub Check: general (24.x, @message-queue-toolkit/s3-payload-store) / build
  • GitHub Check: general (20.x, @message-queue-toolkit/sns) / build
  • GitHub Check: general (24.x, @message-queue-toolkit/sqs) / build
  • GitHub Check: general (20.x, @message-queue-toolkit/amqp) / build
  • GitHub Check: general (20.x, @message-queue-toolkit/sqs) / build
  • GitHub Check: general (22.x, @message-queue-toolkit/gcp-pubsub) / build
  • GitHub Check: general (22.x, @message-queue-toolkit/sqs) / build
  • GitHub Check: kafka (24.x) / build
  • GitHub Check: general (22.x, @message-queue-toolkit/sns) / build
  • GitHub Check: kafka (22.x) / build
🔇 Additional comments (3)
packages/sns/README.md (3)

164-165: ✓ Correct initialization sequence for publisher instantiation.

The addition of await publisher.init() after instantiation is the proper pattern. This ensures the publisher is fully initialized and ready for publishing before any messages are sent. The example correctly shows: instantiate → init → use → close.


313-315: ✓ Consistent initialization pattern across publisher types.

The FIFO publisher example follows the same await init() pattern as the Standard publisher example, which maintains consistency in the documentation.


1-1200: ✓ Documentation update is complete and consistent throughout the file.

The initialization pattern changes are properly reflected across all affected sections:

  • Both publisher examples (Standard and FIFO) show await publisher.init()
  • Consumer examples correctly use await consumer.start()
  • API Reference documents both patterns
  • Testing section demonstrates correct usage

The documentation now clearly communicates the required initialization sequence for publishers before use, which is essential for correct usage.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@CarlosGamero CarlosGamero merged commit e880eae into main Jan 7, 2026
39 checks passed
@CarlosGamero CarlosGamero deleted the trigger_release branch January 7, 2026 16:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants