docs: update readme docs #110
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request primarily involve updates to the Changes
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
README.md (4)
100-103: Consider adding the file location information.The introduction effectively explains the purpose of the report file. Consider adding information about where the
drowser-reports.jsonfile is generated (e.g., root directory, test output directory, etc.) to help users locate it easily.
104-141: Enhance the structure section with examples and clarifications.The structure is well-documented, but consider these improvements:
- Add a JSON example to illustrate the actual structure of the report file
- Clarify how certain metrics are calculated:
- How is the "flaky" status determined?
- What's included in the test coverage calculation?
- How is the average duration calculated?
Example addition:
### Report Structure - **Metrics**: High-level summary of the test execution. + +Example: +```json +{ + "metrics": { + "totalTests": 100, + "passingTests": 95, + "failedTests": 5, + "coverage": 85.5, + "averageDuration": 2.3, + "flakyTests": 2 + } +} +```
142-147: Enhance the usage section with detailed instructions.Consider adding:
- Step-by-step instructions for importing the report into Drowser Studio
- Screenshots or visual aids showing the import process and resulting visualizations
- Examples of insights that can be derived from the visualizations
148-149: Consider adding contribution information.Since Drowser Studio is community-driven, consider adding:
- A link to the contribution guidelines
- Information about how users can get involved
- Links to the community channels or forums
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
README.md(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
README.md (1)
144-146: Verify the URLs in the documentation.
Let's ensure all URLs are valid and accessible.
✅ Verification successful
All URLs in the documentation are valid and accessible
Both URLs mentioned in the documentation are functional and accessible:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all URLs in the documentation are accessible
# Extract and verify URLs
echo "Checking URLs..."
urls=(
"https://drowser.kinotio.io/"
"https://github.com/kinotio/drowser-studio"
)
for url in "${urls[@]}"; do
if curl --output /dev/null --silent --head --fail "$url"; then
echo "✓ $url is accessible"
else
echo "✗ $url is not accessible"
fi
done
Length of output: 567
This is an automated pull request for branch develop
Summary by CodeRabbit
drowser-reports.jsonfile.