Rate forms with additional tags a bit lower during inflection. Fixes Issue #64 #69
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Collaborator
|
Привет! Если не сложно, можно какой-нибудь тест добавить? Склонение, которое раньше работало неправильно, а стало работать правильно? |
Member
Author
|
@kmike, хорошо, попробую добавить. А что travis ругается? Или это не из-за моих изменений? |
Collaborator
|
нет, у pip поддержки python 3.2 нет с версии 8.0, поэтому под 3.2 тесты падают |
Member
Author
|
Добавил два случая, с которыми сталкивался. |
Collaborator
|
Спасибо! |
kmike
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 13, 2016
Rate forms with additional tags a bit lower during inflection. Fixes Issue #64
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Rate forms with additional tags (eg. with 'Infr' tag) a bit lower during inflection. Fixes Issue #64
Исправление для issue #64. За полгода работы с вариантом процедуры, показанном в комментариях к issue, могу сказать, что все работает нормально, и более логично, чем с дефолтным методом
.inflect()