Intro to open source with knative blog series p3

[Leo6Leo]

This PR contains a draft of the first post in the blog series we proposed recently to make it easier for new contributors to contribute code. The proposal can be seen here

Proposed Changes

• Create post 3: API Changes

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for knative ready!

Built without sensitive environment variables

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	9f7f92c
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/knative/deploys/66588fc168cf4500083580d7
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-5949--knative.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[Leo6Leo]

/cc @Cali0707 @pierDipi @creydr

[Cali0707]

Nice start @Leo6Leo !

Just a couple changes needed for clarity/better rendering and then we should be good to go here!

[nainaz]

Great start and left some comments.
Maybe that was the intention of the blog post but to me it felt that it ended abruptly. I didn't "see" any result or output.
I just changed a file, got suggestion to change the other file but then to what end.

[Cali0707]

Maybe that was the intention of the blog post but to me it felt that it ended abruptly. I didn't "see" any result or output.

@nainaz that's a great point, we should probably improve the conclusion a bit

The idea is that readers would then continue to the future blog posts we are working on and make the rest of the required changes there. But, I can see how that could be unclear or leave someone unsatisfied reading the current post.

[nainaz]

Making it more clear would be helpful. I probably missed the last piece of the blog. I still think adding what would this "change" ultimately accomplish would be better Thank you, -N

…

On Wed, 15 May 2024 at 10:13, Calum Murray ***@***.***> wrote: Maybe that was the intention of the blog post but to me it felt that it ended abruptly. I didn't "see" any result or output. @nainaz <https://github.com/nainaz> that's a great point, we should probably improve the conclusion a bit The idea is that readers would then continue to the future blog posts we are working on and make the rest of the required changes there. But, I can see how that could be unclear or leave someone unsatisfied reading the current post. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#5949 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AISZCFAB7NEDST5CMMJD4SLZCNURNAVCNFSM6AAAAABGY3RKO2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCMJSGY3DMMBVGI> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[Cali0707]

/lgtm

Thanks @Leo6Leo !!

[knative-prow]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Cali0707, Leo6Leo

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [Cali0707,Leo6Leo]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment