bump: update codecov to v5 in workflows

[gauron99]

bump codecov to v5 in workflows

[matejvasek]

/approve
/lgtm

[knative-prow]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: gauron99, matejvasek

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [gauron99,matejvasek]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[knative-prow]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: gauron99, matejvasek

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [gauron99,matejvasek]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 65.31%. Comparing base (88afd64) to head (5547753).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2705      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   64.03%   65.31%   +1.28%     
==========================================
  Files         131      131              
  Lines       15591    15591              
==========================================
+ Hits         9984    10184     +200     
+ Misses       4655     4418     -237     
- Partials      952      989      +37     

Flag	Coverage Δ
e2e-test	35.86% <ø> (+0.02%)	⬆️
e2e-test-oncluster	34.21% <ø> (+1.39%)	⬆️
e2e-test-oncluster-runtime	28.57% <ø> (?)
e2e-test-runtime-go	26.47% <ø> (?)
e2e-test-runtime-node	25.88% <ø> (?)
e2e-test-runtime-python	25.88% <ø> (?)
e2e-test-runtime-quarkus	26.03% <ø> (?)
e2e-test-runtime-rust	24.96% <ø> (?)
e2e-test-runtime-springboot	25.02% <ø> (?)
e2e-test-runtime-typescript	25.98% <ø> (?)
integration-tests	51.95% <ø> (+2.29%)	⬆️
unit-tests	50.90% <ø> (?)
unit-tests-macos-latest	?
unit-tests-ubuntu-latest	?
unit-tests-windows-latest	?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[matejvasek]

Why the hell is codecov/project duplicated? And one is passing while the other is failing?

[matejvasek]

/retest codecov/project

[knative-prow]

@matejvasek: The /retest command does not accept any targets.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

/test unit-tests

Use /test all to run all jobs.

Details

In response to this:

/retest codecov/project

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[matejvasek]

/lgtm

[matejvasek]

/test unit-tests

[gauron99]

the unit tests are flaky today, failing locally as well, strange