docs(cmd): fix stale runMCPServer reference in mcp start comment

[Ankitsinghsisodya]

Summary

Updates an inline comment in cmd/mcp.go that referred to a non-existent runMCPServer helper. The actual entry point is runMCPStart.

Motivation

Stale names in comments mislead readers when tracing how mcp start is wired.

Changes

• cmd/mcp.go: comment under NewMCPStartCmd now references runMCPStart.

Testing

• Not required for comment-only change; optional: make check / go test ./cmd/...

[knative-prow]

Hi @Ankitsinghsisodya. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a knative member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work.

Tip

We noticed you've done this a few times! Consider joining the org to skip this step and gain /lgtm and other bot rights. We recommend asking approvers on your previous PRs to sponsor you.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

Note

Copilot was unable to run its full agentic suite in this review.

Updates a code comment in cmd/mcp.go to reference the renamed function runMCPStart instead of runMCPServer.

Changes:

• Comment-only update reflecting a function rename.

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 56.96%. Comparing base (e435a89) to head (d3dcfd3).
⚠️ Report is 9 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3742      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   56.95%   56.96%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         181      181              
  Lines       21116    21116              
==========================================
+ Hits        12026    12029       +3     
+ Misses       7866     7863       -3     
  Partials     1224     1224              

Flag	Coverage Δ
e2e	35.81% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
e2e go	32.42% <ø> (ø)
e2e node	28.20% <ø> (ø)
e2e python	32.80% <ø> (ø)
e2e quarkus	28.34% <ø> (ø)
e2e rust	27.73% <ø> (?)
e2e springboot	26.24% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
e2e typescript	28.30% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
e2e-config-ci	17.70% <ø> (ø)
integration	17.30% <ø> (ø)
unit macos-14	45.05% <ø> (ø)
unit macos-latest	45.05% <ø> (ø)
unit ubuntu-24.04-arm	45.32% <ø> (ø)
unit ubuntu-latest	46.00% <ø> (ø)
unit windows-latest	45.09% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[gauron99]

/lgtm

[knative-prow]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Ankitsinghsisodya, gauron99

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [gauron99]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[gauron99]

/ok-to-test

[gauron99]

/retest