feat: document workspace remove command#48
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Philippe Martin <phmartin@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: Claude Code (Claude Sonnet 4.5) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughAdds a new "workspace remove" documentation block (including the Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Possibly related PRs
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@README.md`:
- Around line 249-253: The fenced code block showing the workspace error message
is missing a language tag, causing markdownlint MD040; update the fenced block
around the lines containing "Error: workspace not found: invalid-id" / "Use
'workspace list'..." to use a language tag (use text) by changing the opening
fence from ``` to ```text so the README.md lint passes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@AGENTS.md`:
- Around line 379-394: Wrap the example block containing the nested
triple-backtick fences in a longer outer fence (use four backticks) so the inner
unlabeled code fences (the problematic ``` and ```markdown blocks shown in the
diff) are treated as literal content; update the snippet so the outer delimiter
is ```` (four backticks) at start and end, leaving the inner ```bash, ```text
and the unlabeled ``` lines unchanged inside the four-backtick wrapper to avoid
MD040 linter errors.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: c4084ef7-f537-4684-9f00-6b0197aca392
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
AGENTS.mdREADME.md
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- README.md
Signed-off-by: Philippe Martin <phmartin@redhat.com> Co-Authored-By: Claude Code (Claude Sonnet 4.5) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2d5863e to
0d03676
Compare
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.