Skip to content

Conversation

@voelzmo
Copy link
Contributor

@voelzmo voelzmo commented Jun 6, 2025

What type of PR is this?

What this PR does / why we need it:

include pod namespace when logging updates. Useful to differentiate between Pods with the same name in different namespaces.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

include pod namespace when logging updates.

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:


@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. area/vertical-pod-autoscaler labels Jun 6, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jun 6, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@ialidzhikov ialidzhikov left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 6, 2025
@adrianmoisey
Copy link
Member

/close
(going to re-open to re-run the tests)

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@adrianmoisey: Closed this PR.

Details

In response to this:

/close
(going to re-open to re-run the tests)

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@adrianmoisey
Copy link
Member

/reopen

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot reopened this Jun 6, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@adrianmoisey: Reopened this PR.

Details

In response to this:

/reopen

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Copy link
Member

@omerap12 omerap12 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ialidzhikov, omerap12, voelzmo

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ialidzhikov
Copy link
Contributor

I see that the failed tests are CA ones:

--- FAIL: TestDeleteInstances (155.07s)
    azure_agent_pool_test.go:426: 
        	Error Trace:	/home/runner/work/autoscaler/autoscaler/go/src/k8s.io/autoscaler/cluster-autoscaler/cloudprovider/azure/azure_agent_pool_test.go:426
        	Error:      	Should be true
        	Test:       	TestDeleteInstances
        	
...

--- FAIL: TestAgentPoolDeleteNodes (155.13s)
    azure_agent_pool_test.go:482: 
        	Error Trace:	/home/runner/work/autoscaler/autoscaler/go/src/k8s.io/autoscaler/cluster-autoscaler/cloudprovider/azure/azure_agent_pool_test.go:482
        	Error:      	Should be true
        	Test:       	TestAgentPoolDeleteNodes

Does someone has permissions to retry the failed GitHub action as the failure is not related to a change from this PR? @raywainman, @adrianmoisey ? 🤔

@adrianmoisey
Copy link
Member

Does someone has permissions to retry the failed GitHub action as the failure is not related to a change from this PR? @raywainman, @adrianmoisey ? 🤔

It seems to be a permanent fail (not a flake). I've asked in sig-autoscaling about it: https://kubernetes.slack.com/archives/C09R1LV8S/p1749291473204429
I'll also bring it up in the sig-autoscaling meeting today

@ialidzhikov
Copy link
Contributor

I created an issue for the failing unit test - #8216. Later on, I saw that there is a already a PR to fix it - #8213.

@ialidzhikov
Copy link
Contributor

/cherry-pick vpa-release-1.4

@k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot

@ialidzhikov: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of vpa-release-1.4 in a new PR and assign it to you.

Details

In response to this:

/cherry-pick vpa-release-1.4

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@ialidzhikov
Copy link
Contributor

/cherry-pick vpa-release-1.3

@k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot

@ialidzhikov: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of vpa-release-1.3 in a new PR and assign it to you.

Details

In response to this:

/cherry-pick vpa-release-1.3

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@ialidzhikov
Copy link
Contributor

/cherry-pick vpa-release-1.2

@k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot

@ialidzhikov: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of vpa-release-1.2 in a new PR and assign it to you.

Details

In response to this:

/cherry-pick vpa-release-1.2

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@adrianmoisey
Copy link
Member

/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@adrianmoisey: Closed this PR.

Details

In response to this:

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@adrianmoisey
Copy link
Member

/reopen

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot reopened this Jun 10, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@adrianmoisey: Reopened this PR.

Details

In response to this:

/reopen

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@adrianmoisey
Copy link
Member

The Github actions tests have passed, I think this will merge soon

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 189e139 into kubernetes:master Jun 10, 2025
12 of 15 checks passed
@k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot

@ialidzhikov: new pull request created: #8226

Details

In response to this:

/cherry-pick vpa-release-1.4

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot

@ialidzhikov: new pull request created: #8227

Details

In response to this:

/cherry-pick vpa-release-1.3

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot

@ialidzhikov: #8204 failed to apply on top of branch "vpa-release-1.2":

Applying: include pod namespace when logging updates
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	vertical-pod-autoscaler/pkg/admission-controller/resource/pod/recommendation/recommendation_provider.go
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging vertical-pod-autoscaler/pkg/admission-controller/resource/pod/recommendation/recommendation_provider.go
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in vertical-pod-autoscaler/pkg/admission-controller/resource/pod/recommendation/recommendation_provider.go
error: Failed to merge in the changes.
hint: Use 'git am --show-current-patch=diff' to see the failed patch
hint: When you have resolved this problem, run "git am --continue".
hint: If you prefer to skip this patch, run "git am --skip" instead.
hint: To restore the original branch and stop patching, run "git am --abort".
hint: Disable this message with "git config advice.mergeConflict false"
Patch failed at 0001 include pod namespace when logging updates

Details

In response to this:

/cherry-pick vpa-release-1.2

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

k8s-ci-robot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 18, 2025
…204-origin-vpa-release-1.2

[vpa-release-1.2] Automated cherry pick of #8204: include pod namespace when logging updates
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/vertical-pod-autoscaler cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants