Skip to content

Updated list of Kubernetes organizations #1754

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Updated list of Kubernetes organizations #1754

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

idvoretskyi
Copy link
Member

@idvoretskyi idvoretskyi added committee/steering Denotes an issue or PR intended to be handled by the steering committee. area/community-management labels Feb 7, 2018
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Feb 7, 2018
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: idvoretskyi

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these OWNERS Files:

You can indicate your approval by writing /approve in a comment
You can cancel your approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 7, 2018
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Feb 7, 2018
@idvoretskyi idvoretskyi mentioned this pull request Feb 7, 2018
Closed
spiffxp
spiffxp reviewed Feb 7, 2018
View reviewed changes
org-owners-guide.md
* [kubernetes-security](https://github.com/kubernetes-security)
* [kubernetes-sig-testing](https://github.com/kubernetes-sig-testing)
* [kubernetes-providers](https://github.com/kubernetes-providers)
* [kubernetes-addons](https://github.com/kubernetes-addons)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would prefer we differentiate between orgs we are actively using, vs orgs which we are holding for potential future use

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In the original list I was trying to only list the orgs we are using and not the ones we are name squatting on. For example, we aren't using kubernetes-charts. You'll noticed the section title is "Current Organizations In Use". If there are no repos on an org or no immediate plans to start adding them can we not list them?

Copy link
Member Author

@idvoretskyi idvoretskyi Feb 7, 2018 •
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@spiffxp @mattfarina SGTM.

I'll split the list into two categories, but have to reconfirm:

Actively used GitHub Organizations:

Non-actively used GitHub Organizations:

Is this list correct?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

second list has kuberentes-providers twice and is non alphabetized, but otherwise LGTM

@spiffxp
Copy link
Contributor

spiffxp commented Feb 13, 2018

@idvoretskyi any update on this?

@cblecker
Copy link
Member

/uncc

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the request for review from cblecker February 13, 2018 19:21
idvoretskyi added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 12, 2018
@idvoretskyi
Updated list of Kubernetes organizations
577944b 
Updated #1754
@idvoretskyi idvoretskyi mentioned this pull request Mar 12, 2018
Merged
@idvoretskyi
Copy link
Member Author

Closed in favor of #1923

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@mattfarina mattfarina Awaiting requested review from mattfarina

@calebamiles calebamiles Awaiting requested review from calebamiles

1 more reviewer

@spiffxp spiffxp spiffxp left review comments

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/community-management cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. committee/steering Denotes an issue or PR intended to be handled by the steering committee. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants

@idvoretskyi @k8s-ci-robot @spiffxp @cblecker @mattfarina