-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.3k
Add sig-security-assessments sub-project #6512
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
PushkarJ
wants to merge
1
commit into
kubernetes:master
from
PushkarJ:add-sig-security-assessments-sub-project
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This feels like it's tying the subproject pretty closely to the history of the CAPI assessment; WDYT about creating a new slack channel for a fresh history and more general focus?.
As we figure out the long-term workflows for self-assessments we can come back and update things as necessary.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would also +1 avoid tying it directly to capi. If the channel has the right folk in it, could just rename it to be more generic.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @tabbysable and @mrbobbytables ! I'll have a look at the slack channel to see its content. If it's general enough, I'll plan to rename. Otherwise I'll make a new one.
If I were to rename the channel, is there a process I need to go through for doing that? Or just rename it and submit a PR to update the README?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
IMO, new channel (
#sig-security-assessments) makes sense since the discussion in current channel was very specific to Cluster API.That channel can act as root node of security assessments sub-project (from thought exercise perspective) that can branch out to new channels that are project specific. e.g.
If we decide to go this route,
Link to request new channel is here
Example pull request that was successfully completed to create a new slack channel can be found here: New channel for security assessment of cluster api #5792
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Awesome - I came to the same conclusion reading the channel on Friday - new channel for the root node! Do I need to get any further approval to go ahead and request the new channel, or just have at it and get it stood up?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just requested a new channel! #6722