sig-pm: Add project-board-maintainers team

[justaugustus]

Signed-off-by: Stephen Augustus saugustus@vmware.com

/assign @calebamiles @idvoretskyi @jdumars

[idvoretskyi]

/hold

[idvoretskyi]

/lgtm

This was discussed at the latest Steering committee meeting.

[cblecker]

What’s the intent here as far as permissions?

[justaugustus]

@cblecker -- I've added an issue to discuss project grooming here: kubernetes/community#3267

Basically, groups that wanted their backlogs groomed would add project-managers to their board with write access. Ideally, I'd love if that would happen automatically for org-level boards, but I'm not sure if that's possible in GitHub.

[cblecker]

two nit picky things (aka naming is hard):

• "project-managers" has a more generic implication, rather than "a team of people who are being given permissions to board". maybe something like "sig-pm-board-maintainers" would be more explicit as to what the team is actually doing
• The description kind of implies "this group must be given permissions to boards" as opposed to "this is a team of people who can sigs can subscribe to, to help them with maintaining project boards". The latter is a bit wordy, but again, maybe there is a way to be more clear.

[cblecker]

/lgtm
/approve

Looks great, @justaugustus!

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: cblecker, idvoretskyi, justaugustus

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• config/kubernetes/sig-pm/OWNERS [cblecker,idvoretskyi]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[justaugustus]

@cblecker -- thanks for the tips! Updated team name to project-board-maintainers and updated description.

[justaugustus]

/hold cancel
(Ihor's hold was around the communication aspect of it, but this has now been opened for discussion in kubernetes/community#3267)

[idvoretskyi]

/hold cancel
(Ihor's hold was around the communication aspect of it, but this has now been opened for discussion in kubernetes/community#3267)

+1 🎉