Skip to content

Add LTS flag to v26.0 release entry#950

Merged
timothycoleman merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
lts
Jan 16, 2026
Merged

Add LTS flag to v26.0 release entry#950
timothycoleman merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
lts

Conversation

@timothycoleman
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@timothycoleman timothycoleman commented Jan 16, 2026

User description

Add 'lts' property to version v26.0 in repos.json

Description

Page previews


PR Type

Enhancement


Description

  • Add LTS flag to v26.0 release entry in repos.json

  • Mark version v26.0 as long-term support release


Diagram Walkthrough

flowchart LR
  repos["repos.json"] -- "add lts property" --> v26["v26.0 release entry"]
  v26 -- "lts: true" --> lts["LTS flag enabled"]
Loading

File Walkthrough

Relevant files
Configuration changes
repos.json
Add LTS flag to v26.0 release entry                                           

import/repos.json

  • Added "lts": true property to v26.0 release entry
  • Marks v26.0 as a long-term support version
  • Added trailing comma to startPage property for JSON formatting
    consistency
+2/-1     

Add 'lts' property to version v26.0 in repos.json
@timothycoleman timothycoleman requested a review from a team as a code owner January 16, 2026 16:49
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Docs Preview

  • Status: ⏳ Creating preview…

@qodo-code-review
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

PR Compliance Guide 🔍

Below is a summary of compliance checks for this PR:

Security Compliance
🟢
No security concerns identified No security vulnerabilities detected by AI analysis. Human verification advised for critical code.
Ticket Compliance
🎫 No ticket provided
  • Create ticket/issue
Codebase Duplication Compliance
Codebase context is not defined

Follow the guide to enable codebase context checks.

Custom Compliance
🟢
Generic: Comprehensive Audit Trails

Objective: To create a detailed and reliable record of critical system actions for security analysis
and compliance.

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Meaningful Naming and Self-Documenting Code

Objective: Ensure all identifiers clearly express their purpose and intent, making code
self-documenting

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Robust Error Handling and Edge Case Management

Objective: Ensure comprehensive error handling that provides meaningful context and graceful
degradation

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Secure Error Handling

Objective: To prevent the leakage of sensitive system information through error messages while
providing sufficient detail for internal debugging.

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Secure Logging Practices

Objective: To ensure logs are useful for debugging and auditing without exposing sensitive
information like PII, PHI, or cardholder data.

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Generic: Security-First Input Validation and Data Handling

Objective: Ensure all data inputs are validated, sanitized, and handled securely to prevent
vulnerabilities

Status: Passed

Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules

Compliance status legend 🟢 - Fully Compliant
🟡 - Partial Compliant
🔴 - Not Compliant
⚪ - Requires Further Human Verification
🏷️ - Compliance label

@qodo-code-review
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

PR Code Suggestions ✨

No code suggestions found for the PR.

@timothycoleman timothycoleman merged commit 597dc11 into master Jan 16, 2026
2 of 3 checks passed
@timothycoleman timothycoleman deleted the lts branch January 16, 2026 16:51
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Docs build

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants