MCP Catalog Challenge: what does your model actually see? #11
Replies: 1 comment
|
rc.8 is now public: reviewed plugin release, retrieval report, and install path Plugin release: https://github.com/labmimors/dsh-mcp-lens/releases/tag/v0.1.0-rc.8 Install note: download and verify the asset before passing its local path to The calculator still measures locally and shares aggregate metrics only. The URL fragment contains bounded numeric tool and byte fields plus an accidental-edit checksum; it never contains the schemas you pasted. The dependency-free MCP Lens Schema Audit Action is unchanged in rc.8, so the reviewed reference stays on rc.7:
If you try the calculator or the plugin, reply with only aggregate counts, your client or harness, and the workload shape. Please keep schemas, internal names, and credentials private. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
MCP Catalog Challenge: what does your model actually see?
MCP Lens now has a local-only calculator for one narrow question: how many tool schemas, and how many canonical UTF-8 JSON bytes, are visible to your model?
Try it here: https://labmimors.github.io/dsh-mcp-lens/
The page runs entirely in your browser. It has no upload API or external scripts. Please still remove server names, internal descriptions, credentials, URLs, and any other private metadata before pasting a catalog.
If you are willing to share a sanitized result, reply with:
You can also attach the PNG generated by the calculator. The exported card contains only the summary numbers and claim boundary, not the pasted schemas.
What would be especially useful:
Please do not post API keys, auth headers, signed URLs, private server names, raw production schemas, or customer data.
The calculator measures
JSON.stringify(tools)UTF-8 bytes. It does not claim token, billing, latency, or task-quality savings. The separate DeepSeek pilot and its tradeoffs are documented here:https://github.com/labmimors/dsh-mcp-lens/blob/main/docs/LIVE_DEEPSEEK_PILOT.md
I will turn reproducible search misses into regression cases and keep any public comparison protocol visible in issue #9.
All reactions