Skip to content

Conversation

@ericdong-langchain
Copy link
Collaborator

Seeing this error in record experiment example.

Exception in thread "main" com.langchain.smith.errors.BadRequestException: 400: {error=Bad request: invalid 'dotted_order': invalid timestamp in dotted_order 20251208T144553541735000 at index 0: parsing time "20251208T144553541735000" as "2006-01-02T15:04:05.999999999Z07:00": cannot parse "1208T144553541735000" as "-" for run_id:ecec66cf-da94-4d27-a29f-08ca642db9d7 trace_id:ecec66cf-da94-4d27-a29f-08ca642db9d7 dotted_order:20251208T144553541735000Zecec66cf-da94-4d27-a29f-08ca642db9d7 parent_run_id:}

Fixed formatting in timestamp.

@ericdong-langchain ericdong-langchain merged commit 243e318 into next Dec 9, 2025
8 checks passed
@ericdong-langchain ericdong-langchain deleted the fix/record-exp-example-formatting branch December 9, 2025 14:10
@stainless-app stainless-app bot mentioned this pull request Dec 9, 2025
stainless-app bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 9, 2025
* chore: Configure workflow for CodeQL

* feat(api): pagination

added pagination to all endpoints that use pagination

* codegen metadata

* chore(internal): version bump

* codegen metadata

* feat(api): change paginated retrieve methods to list

change paginated retrieve methods to list

* feat(api): add go target

* codegen metadata

* feat(api): pagination read me

added pagination read me

* codegen metadata

* feat(api): readme example - change REPLACE_ME session_id to uuid

* feat: method counter in ci

* codegen metadata

* test

* feat(api): api update

* fix: formatting error in record experiment example (#81)

* release: 0.1.0-alpha.18

---------

Co-authored-by: xornivore <30147836+xornivore@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: ericdong-langchain <ericdong@langchain.dev>
Co-authored-by: stainless-app[bot] <142633134+stainless-app[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants