Skip to content

Conversation

@greglucas
Copy link
Collaborator

When I was trying to profile things across versions, it got a little annoying to comment/uncomment lines of files for the different loading XTCE patterns. This adds a small shim layer for the old XtcePacketDefinition format that then warns and suggests how to transition to the new patterns, still working the same as previously.

@greglucas greglucas requested a review from medley56 as a code owner February 18, 2025 16:13
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 18, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 91.86%. Comparing base (1029874) to head (1694082).
Report is 11 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #145      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   91.82%   91.86%   +0.04%     
==========================================
  Files          35       36       +1     
  Lines        2543     2557      +14     
==========================================
+ Hits         2335     2349      +14     
  Misses        208      208              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Member

@medley56 medley56 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice. This is good user support.

@medley56 medley56 merged commit 5028734 into lasp:main Feb 26, 2025
19 checks passed
@greglucas greglucas deleted the xtce-back-compat branch February 26, 2025 19:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants