feat: Create generic Option type inspired by Rust #34
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This SDK already supports ldvalue.Optional(Int|Boolean|String) types. However, this exposes a much more generic type that can be used without those restrictions.
keelerm84
force-pushed
the
mk/sdk-1258/option
branch
from
ca8bb18 to
1c849fd
Compare
kinyoklion
approved these changes
May 19, 2025
Merged
keelerm84
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 19, 2025
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop* --- ## [3.3.0](v3.2.0...v3.3.0) (2025-05-19) ### Features * Create generic Option type inspired by Rust ([#34](#34)) ([1e748d5](1e748d5)) --- This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please). Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This SDK already supports ldvalue.Optional(Int|Boolean|String) types.
However, this exposes a much more generic type that can be used without
those restrictions.