Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jul 24, 2024. It is now read-only.

fix(category_theory/types): rename lemma ulift_functor.map#1133

Merged
mergify[bot] merged 3 commits into
leanprover-community:masterfrom
urkud:ulift_functor.map
Jun 18, 2019
Merged

fix(category_theory/types): rename lemma ulift_functor.map#1133
mergify[bot] merged 3 commits into
leanprover-community:masterfrom
urkud:ulift_functor.map

Conversation

@urkud

@urkud urkud commented Jun 15, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This way, one can use ulift_functor.map in the sense functor.map ulift_functor.

TO CONTRIBUTORS:

Make sure you have:

  • reviewed and applied the coding style: coding, naming
  • for tactics:
  • make sure definitions and lemmas are put in the right files
  • make sure definitions and lemmas are not redundant

If this PR is related to a discussion on Zulip, please include a link in the discussion.

For reviewers: code review check list

…lemma

Now we can use `ulift_functor.map` in the sense `functor.map ulift_functor`.
@urkud urkud requested a review from a team as a code owner June 15, 2019 02:02
kim-em
kim-em previously requested changes Jun 15, 2019

@kim-em kim-em left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good idea to fix this.

I think the canonical name would be ulift_functor_map.

@rwbarton rwbarton added the ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.) label Jun 15, 2019
@urkud

urkud commented Jun 15, 2019

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@semorrison Fixed. Could you please resolve the "changes requested" status of your review?

@ChrisHughes24 ChrisHughes24 dismissed kim-em’s stale review June 17, 2019 16:00

Changes were made

@ChrisHughes24 ChrisHughes24 added ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.) and removed ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.) labels Jun 17, 2019
@mergify mergify Bot merged commit 235b899 into leanprover-community:master Jun 18, 2019
@urkud urkud deleted the ulift_functor.map branch June 30, 2019 22:49
butterthebuddha pushed a commit to butterthebuddha/mathlib that referenced this pull request May 15, 2020
…ver-community#1133)

* fix(category_theory/types): avoid shadowing `ulift_functor.map` by a lemma

Now we can use `ulift_functor.map` in the sense `functor.map ulift_functor`.

* `ulift_functor.map_spec` → `ulift_functor_map`

as suggested by @semorrison in leanprover-community#1133 (review)
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

ready-to-merge All that is left is for bors to build and merge this PR. (Remember you need to say `bors r+`.)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants