Skip to content
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension


Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 4 additions & 0 deletions .github/workflows/lean_action_ci.yml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -14,6 +14,10 @@ jobs:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: Set TEST_ARGS manually
run: |
echo "TEST_ARGS='--wfail --iofail'" >> $GITHUB_ENV
shell: bash
- uses: leanprover/lean-action@v1
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think you can also change the v1 and possibly the username here to point at the commit with the fix

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@chenson2018 chenson2018 Mar 17, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd be happy to point to a specific commit in the lean-action repo once the fix lands, but I'm not sure we should point to individual usernames in CI if at all avoidable. I was initially of the opinion that sticking to v1 seemed fine as this does pick up new minor releases, but the PR adding test-args (where I was the one who introduced the bug...) took ~5 months to land in a release,

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If you point to a specific git hash then I think the risk of pointing to an external user goes away.

with:
build-args: "--wfail --iofail"
Expand Down
Loading