Skip to content

fix: missing words in “Elaboration Results” #682

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
nomeata merged 1 commit into from
Dec 3, 2025
Merged

fix: missing words in “Elaboration Results” #682

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion Manual/Elaboration.lean
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ fun {α} motive x h_1 h_2 =>
:::paragraph
The pre-definition is then sent to the compiler and to the kernel.
The compiler receives the pre-definition as-is, with recursion intact.
The version sent to the kernel, on the other hand, undergoes a second transformation that replaces explicit recursion with {ref "structural-recursion"}[uses of recursors], {ref "well-founded-recursion"}[well-founded recursion], or .
The version sent to the kernel, on the other hand, undergoes a second transformation that replaces explicit recursion with {ref "structural-recursion"}[uses of recursors], {ref "well-founded-recursion"}[well-founded recursion], or {ref "partial-fixpoint"}[partial fixpoint recursion].
This split is for three reasons:
* The compiler can compile {ref "partial-unsafe"}[`partial` functions] that the kernel treats as opaque constants for the purposes of reasoning.
* The compiler can also compile {ref "partial-unsafe"}[`unsafe` functions] that bypass the kernel entirely.
Expand Down