feat: adding example github workflows #1
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
This PR adds example GitHub Actions workflows and configuration templates to help set up CI/CD, code quality checks, automated releases, and changelog management for a Laravel project.
- Provides workflow templates for testing (Pest, PHPStan), code style fixing, AWS ECS deployment, and release management
- Includes GitHub configuration for release notes categorization and a pull request template
- Enables automated changelog updates on release events
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 8 out of 8 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
.github/workflows/update-changelog.yml.example |
Automates CHANGELOG.md updates when releases are published |
.github/workflows/release.yml.example |
Creates releases with auto-generated version numbers using YYYY.MM.PATCH format |
.github/workflows/phpstan.yml.example |
Runs PHPStan static analysis on pull requests |
.github/workflows/pest.yml.example |
Executes Pest tests with MySQL on pull requests |
.github/workflows/fix-code-style.yml.example |
Daily scheduled job to fix code style with Pint and Prettier |
.github/workflows/deploy.yml.example |
Deploys to AWS ECS with automatic versioning and post-deploy Laravel commands |
.github/release.yml |
Configures release note categorization based on PR labels |
.github/pull_request_template.md |
Provides structured template for pull request descriptions |
Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.
Summary of ChangesHello @leek, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request introduces foundational elements for improved development workflow and release management. It standardizes the pull request creation process and sets up automated changelog generation for future releases, enhancing consistency and clarity across the project. Highlights
Ignored Files
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a pull request template and a release configuration file. Both are well-structured and follow common practices for repository management. I have one suggestion for the pull request template to remove some redundant checklist items, which will improve clarity for contributors. Overall, these are great additions to the project's workflow.
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. Note Other AI code review bot(s) detectedCodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request adds GitHub configuration files to standardize development processes. It introduces a PR template for structured submissions, a release notes configuration, and six example CI/CD workflows covering code style enforcement, testing, static analysis, deployment, releases, and changelog updates. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant GH as GitHub
participant WF as Deploy Workflow
participant AWS as AWS (ECR/ECS)
participant ECS as ECS Service
participant RDS as RDS
participant Sentry as Sentry
GH->>WF: Push to staging/uat/production
WF->>WF: Determine environment
alt Production
WF->>WF: Generate version tag
end
WF->>AWS: Configure credentials & login to ECR
WF->>AWS: Build & push Docker image
WF->>ECS: Trigger force deployment
WF->>ECS: Poll for stabilization
alt Stabilization fails
WF->>AWS: Collect diagnostics (status, logs)
WF->>WF: Exit with error
else Stabilization succeeds
WF->>RDS: Run migrations & cache commands
alt Production
WF->>GH: Create GitHub release
WF->>Sentry: Create Sentry release (non-blocking)
end
end
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~25 minutes The changes introduce multiple new workflow files with varying complexity—from straightforward CI configurations (Pest, PHPStan, style fixing) to intricate deployment logic with conditional environments, ECS orchestration, and error handling. While individual files follow consistent GitHub Actions patterns, the heterogeneous nature (different triggers, different services, different error strategies) and the density of deployment-specific logic require careful examination of each workflow's correctness and integration points. ✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro 📒 Files selected for processing (8)
Comment |
Summary by CodeRabbit