Skip to content

Use tracing for subcommand logs#95

Merged
leynos merged 2 commits intomainfrom
codex/replace-println-with-info-logging-calls
Aug 13, 2025
Merged

Use tracing for subcommand logs#95
leynos merged 2 commits intomainfrom
codex/replace-println-with-info-logging-calls

Conversation

@leynos
Copy link
Owner

@leynos leynos commented Aug 10, 2025

Summary

  • log Clean and Graph subcommand requests with tracing

Testing

  • make fmt
  • make lint
  • make test

https://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_e_689897a468f48322a40409089384af7c

Summary by Sourcery

Enhancements:

  • Replace println! calls for the Clean and Graph subcommands with tracing’s info! macro

@sourcery-ai
Copy link
Contributor

sourcery-ai bot commented Aug 10, 2025

Reviewer's guide (collapsed on small PRs)

Reviewer's Guide

Replaces unstructured stdout messages for the Clean and Graph subcommands with structured tracing.info! logs.

Sequence diagram for Clean and Graph subcommand logging

sequenceDiagram
    participant Runner
    participant tracing
    Runner->>tracing: info!("Clean requested")
    Runner->>tracing: info!("Graph requested")
Loading

Class diagram for updated logging in subcommands

classDiagram
    class Runner {
        +run(cli: &Cli) Result
    }
    class Commands {
        <<enum>>
        Clean
        Graph
    }
    Runner --> Commands
    class tracing {
        +info!(...)
    }
    Runner ..> tracing : uses
Loading

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Switch subcommand notifications from println! to tracing info! calls
  • Replace println!("Clean requested") with info!("Clean requested")
  • Replace println!("Graph requested") with info!("Graph requested")
src/runner.rs

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 10, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • None.
  • Refactor

    • Clean and Graph commands no longer print status messages to the console; messages are now recorded at info level in the application logs.
    • Behaviour, results, and exit codes are unchanged; only the destination of the messages has moved.
    • If you relied on console output for these commands, please consult the logs instead.

Walkthrough

Replace two stdout println! calls with tracing::info! structured logs in src/runner.rs for the Commands::Clean and Commands::Graph branches; no control flow or return values changed.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Logging macro replacement
src/runner.rs
Replace println! with info! (target "netsuke::subcommand", subcommand = "clean"/"graph") emitting "Subcommand requested".

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • codescene-delta-analysis

Poem

Swap the print for info's light,
Mark the clean and graph tonight.
Emit the event, tag the name,
Keep the flow; preserve the aim.
Logs now whisper, calm and bright.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f7a7cbf and 10a92e7.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/runner.rs (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
**/*.rs

⚙️ CodeRabbit Configuration File

**/*.rs: * Seek to keep the cyclomatic complexity of functions no more than 12.

  • Adhere to single responsibility and CQRS

  • Place function attributes after doc comments.

  • Do not use return in single-line functions.

  • Move conditionals with >2 branches into a predicate function.

  • Avoid unsafe unless absolutely necessary.

  • Every module must begin with a //! doc comment that explains the module's purpose and utility.

  • Comments and docs must follow en-GB-oxendict (-ize / -our) spelling and grammar

  • Lints must not be silenced except as a last resort.

    • #[allow] is forbidden.
    • Only narrowly scoped #[expect(lint, reason = "...")] is allowed.
    • No lint groups, no blanket or file-wide suppression.
    • Include FIXME: with link if a fix is expected.
  • Where code is only used by specific features, it must be conditionally compiled or a conditional expectation for unused_code applied.

  • Use rstest fixtures for shared setup and to avoid repetition between tests.

  • Replace duplicated tests with #[rstest(...)] parameterised cases.

  • Prefer mockall for mocks/stubs.

  • Prefer .expect() over .unwrap()

  • Ensure that any API or behavioural changes are reflected in the documentation in docs/

  • Ensure that any completed roadmap steps are recorded in the appropriate roadmap in docs/

  • Files must not exceed 400 lines in length

    • Large modules must be decomposed
    • Long match statements or dispatch tables should be decomposed by domain and collocated with targets
    • Large blocks of inline data (e.g., test fixtures, constants or templates) must be moved to external files and inlined at compile-time or loaded at run-time.

Files:

  • src/runner.rs
🔍 Additional research (Deepwiki)

Summary of relevant context found:

  • Change: runner.rs prints for Clean and Graph are replaced by tracing::info! that emit structured events (target "netsuke::subcommand", subcommand "clean"/"graph"), moving output from stdout to info-level logs; no control-flow or public API changes. (matches PR summary; runner module handles these subcommands)

  • Runner/CLI responsibilities: src/runner.rs implements execution of CLI Commands including Build (default), Clean (delegates to ninja -t clean), and Graph (generates DOT via ninja -t graph) — verify tracing use here will replace prior println!-based user-visible messages.

  • Test/CI expectations: project uses make fmt/lint/test and strict quality gates; ensure logging change doesn't break tests or CI expectations (e.g., tests or docs asserting stdout output).

Suggested reviewer checks:

  • Confirm tracing is initialized at application start (so info! messages are emitted in normal runs).
  • Search for tests or docs that assert on stdout messages from clean/graph and update if they relied on println!.
  • Verify structured fields (target/subcommand/message) follow project logging conventions.

Tools used:

  • functions.read_wiki_contents (leynos/netsuke) — cited above
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/runner.rs (2)

93-95: Structured tracing event for Graph — LGTM

Keep the explicit target and subcommand field; this aligns with the project’s move to structured logs.


89-91: Verify tracing setup and stdout-dependent tests
Ensure the tracing subscriber is initialized in your application entrypoint so that info! logs actually emit. Confirm no tests or documentation still assert on removed stdout messages for the clean or graph subcommands. Finally, check for any remaining println! calls to ensure they’re deliberate.

• Verify subscriber initialization in src/main.rs (or equivalent)
• Remove or update tests/docs expecting “Clean requested” or “Graph requested” on stdout
• Audit remaining println!( usages across the repo

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch codex/replace-println-with-info-logging-calls

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR/Issue comments)

Type @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Status, Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Status Page to check the current availability of CodeRabbit.
  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@greptile-apps greptile-apps bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Greptile Summary

This PR replaces direct console output (println!) with structured logging (info!) for the Clean and Graph subcommands in the runner module. The change standardizes logging across the codebase by leveraging the existing tracing infrastructure that's already set up in the project.

The Clean and Graph subcommands are currently stub implementations that only log their invocation, making this an ideal place to adopt the established logging framework. The info! macro is already imported in the runner module, and the tracing system is properly initialized in main.rs with conditional debug-level logging based on the verbose flag. This change provides better control over log output and maintains consistency with the project's logging approach.

Important Files Changed

File Changes
Filename Score Overview
src/runner.rs 5/5 Replaced println! calls with info! logging for Clean and Graph subcommands

Confidence score: 5/5

  • This PR is safe to merge with minimal risk
  • Score reflects simple, well-aligned changes that use existing infrastructure correctly
  • No files require special attention

1 file reviewed, no comments

Edit Code Review Bot Settings | Greptile

Copy link
Contributor

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @leynos - I've reviewed your changes and found some issues that need to be addressed.


Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0831e26 and f7a7cbf.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/runner.rs (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
**/*.rs

📄 CodeRabbit Inference Engine (AGENTS.md)

**/*.rs: Comment why, not what. Explain assumptions, edge cases, trade-offs, or complexity. Don't echo the obvious.
Use functions and composition. Avoid repetition by extracting reusable logic. Prefer generators or comprehensions, and declarative code to imperative repetition when readable.
Small, meaningful functions. Functions must be small, clear in purpose, single responsibility, and obey command/query segregation.
Name things precisely. Use clear, descriptive variable and function names. For booleans, prefer names with is, has, or should.
Every module must begin with a module level (//! ) comment explaining the module's purpose and utility.
Document public APIs using Rustdoc comments (///) so documentation can be generated with cargo doc.
Place function attributes after doc comments.
Do not use return in single-line functions.
Prefer immutable data and avoid unnecessary mut bindings.
Handle errors with the Result type instead of panicking where feasible.
Prefer .expect() over .unwrap().
Use concat!() to combine long string literals rather than escaping newlines with a backslash.
Prefer single line versions of functions where appropriate.
Clippy warnings MUST be disallowed.
Lints must not be silenced except as a last resort.
Lint rule suppressions must be tightly scoped and include a clear reason.
Prefer expect over allow.
Keep file size manageable. No single code file may be longer than 400 lines. Long switch statements or dispatch tables should be broken up by feature and constituents colocated with targets. Large blocks of test data should be moved to external data files.
Illustrate with clear examples. Function documentation must include clear examples demonstrating the usage and outcome of the function. Test documentation should omit examples where the example serves only to reiterate the test logic.
Prefer semantic error enums. Derive std::error::Error (via the thiserror crate) for any condition the caller might inspect, retry, or map to an HTTP status.
...

Files:

  • src/runner.rs

⚙️ CodeRabbit Configuration File

**/*.rs: * Seek to keep the cyclomatic complexity of functions no more than 12.

  • Adhere to single responsibility and CQRS

  • Place function attributes after doc comments.

  • Do not use return in single-line functions.

  • Move conditionals with >2 branches into a predicate function.

  • Avoid unsafe unless absolutely necessary.

  • Every module must begin with a //! doc comment that explains the module's purpose and utility.

  • Comments and docs must follow en-GB-oxendict (-ize / -our) spelling and grammar

  • Lints must not be silenced except as a last resort.

    • #[allow] is forbidden.
    • Only narrowly scoped #[expect(lint, reason = "...")] is allowed.
    • No lint groups, no blanket or file-wide suppression.
    • Include FIXME: with link if a fix is expected.
  • Where code is only used by specific features, it must be conditionally compiled or a conditional expectation for unused_code applied.

  • Use rstest fixtures for shared setup and to avoid repetition between tests.

  • Replace duplicated tests with #[rstest(...)] parameterised cases.

  • Prefer mockall for mocks/stubs.

  • Prefer .expect() over .unwrap()

  • Ensure that any API or behavioural changes are reflected in the documentation in docs/

  • Ensure that any completed roadmap steps are recorded in the appropriate roadmap in docs/

  • Files must not exceed 400 lines in length

    • Large modules must be decomposed
    • Long match statements or dispatch tables should be decomposed by domain and collocated with targets
    • Large blocks of inline data (e.g., test fixtures, constants or templates) must be moved to external files and inlined at compile-time or loaded at run-time.

Files:

  • src/runner.rs
🔍 MCP Research (2 servers)

Deepwiki:

  • Document [docs/roadmap.md] details that the "Use tracing for subcommand logs" PR corresponds to Phase 3: Production Polish, which includes CLI completeness with added subcommands like clean and graph that delegate to ninja commands and provide refined CLI feedback. This phase also integrates the tracing crate for logging and improves error handling and security. The clean and graph commands are explicitly mentioned as part of this phase's CLI completeness efforts (docs/roadmap.md:155-170).

  • The src/runner.rs module is responsible for command execution logic, including handling CLI commands such as Clean and Graph (Module Organization). The PR changes in src/runner.rs replace println! calls with tracing's info! macro for these subcommands, aligning with the Phase 3 roadmap goal of improving CLI feedback and logging.

  • The Command Line Interface documentation confirms that Clean and Graph are primary commands handled by the CLI and executed via runner::run() (Command Line Interface). The Clean command removes build artifacts by invoking ninja -t clean, and the Graph command generates a DOT format dependency graph via ninja -t graph. The PR's logging changes improve informational output for these commands.

  • The Developer Guide and Code Quality Standards documents specify that logging and error handling improvements in Phase 3 include adopting structured logging with crates like tracing and enhancing CLI feedback. The PR's use of info! macros for subcommand logs fits within these standards and the roadmap's production polish phase.

Context7:

  • Document /context7/rs-tracing: The info! macro in the tracing crate constructs an event at the info level, functioning similarly to the event! macro. It supports various patterns for specifying name, target, parent, fields, and arguments, allowing flexible info-level logging. (Source: Rust info! Macro API Documentation, https://docs.rs/tracing/latest/src/tracing/macros.rs)

  • Document /context7/rs-tracing: Usage examples of the info! macro show how to log info-level events with structured fields, targets, and formatted messages, e.g., info!("Graph requested") would log an informational event with that message. (Source: Rust info! Macro Usage Examples, https://docs.rs/tracing/latest/tracing/macro.info)

  • Document /context7/rs-tracing: The info! macro expands to an event! macro call at the INFO level, supporting named events, targets, parents, and arbitrary fields or formatted messages. This macro is part of the structured, event-based diagnostic information collection framework in Rust. (Source: Rust info! Macro Definition, https://docs.rs/tracing/latest/tracing/macro.info)

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 120000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: build-test
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/runner.rs (1)

93-95: Confirm that tracing subscriber already captures info-level logs

Tracing subscriber is initialised in src/main.rs (line 13) with

fmt().with_max_level(Level::DEBUG).init();

This setup emits info! events by default. No changes required.

Copy link

@greptile-apps greptile-apps bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

1 file reviewed, no comments

Edit Code Review Bot Settings | Greptile

@leynos
Copy link
Owner Author

leynos commented Aug 13, 2025

@coderabbitai review

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 13, 2025

✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

@leynos leynos merged commit 95f1b05 into main Aug 13, 2025
4 checks passed
@leynos leynos deleted the codex/replace-println-with-info-logging-calls branch August 13, 2025 11:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant