Skip misc_ex17 when PETSc is not enabled#4056
Merged
roystgnr merged 3 commits intolibMesh:develfrom Jan 22, 2025
Merged
Conversation
Not strictly necessary, but I prefer this since it matches how all the other examples are formatted.
roystgnr
approved these changes
Jan 22, 2025
Member
|
man that's probably been failing for a while. Sorry guys. Feel free to DM me when stuff like this happens |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
FYI @lindsayad something like this is necessary to fix the libmesh devel -> master merge. I think the easiest thing is to skip the example when PETSc is not available.