feat: upload long vote description to IPFS. Add new vote as example.

[BATMAH69]

Description

Goal

We want to have long-text free-form description for the onchain votes. Don't want to fit it into transaction, so would rather use IPFS for storage.

Proposed result

Tweak the vote.lido.fi UI code (next.js typescript app) so that if the vote data has ipfs hash (among other text), UI shows separate field with the text loaded from that IPFS hash (links in this text should be regular links in the UI).

The description should be uploaded to the IPFS upon the vote creation in script from https://github.com/lidofinance/scripts. The utils should have the function uploading the text to ipfs & adding the link to it to vote description.

Demo

case examples (with ipfs description | without):

CLI messages in sllent mode:

CLI messages in ineraction mode:

Markdown examples:

clear markdown in grid view:

Code review notes

New env variable should be added WEB3_STORAGE_TOKEN api key form web3.storage

Testing notes

I created vote only as example.

Checklist:

• Checked the changes locally.

[TheDZhon]

Hey-hey,

You've made a lot of here, awesome 👍

will have a look till Monday's EOD 👀

[TheDZhon]

Done the first pass of a review 👍

The idea is neat and essential for the vote process transparency. I am all for it!
Thank you for driving the change here.

Left a few considerations and suggestions. To sum up, two points arise from my side:

• maybe we can improve cross-validation of description and overall sanity checks (not only for format but for the content itself)
• maybe we can detect what is the preferred IPFS service provider based on env vars set and give up only if no one was provided

[TheDZhon]

Done the second pass 👀

[TheDZhon]

The merge conflict has been appeared with the latest master branch updates 👀

[TheDZhon]

👀 Added a small set of updates

[TheDZhon]

Have my approval for the outstanding work here 👍

Please consider making a final decision about the description format enforcement to merge it into the master branch.

cc: @zuzueeka

[zuzueeka]

Great job on this! This should really simplify understanding the vote for voters.

I do have some minor concerns about the necessity of the vote_desc_items at the moment. Will there be any duplication of text from the general description? I've started a discussion in the Gov team chat about this.
upd. I don’t have any more questions about vote_desc_items and duplication of the items, Jenya K. made it clear to me.

Also, I was wondering if it's possible to include links in the description, such as "Item 1. Onboard 2 NOs. Discussion." I'd love to see how this would look on the test network.

[zuzueeka]

I really like everything! Thank you so much for your hard work.
The only small comment I have is that I would like to see the CID displayed as a link after the voting points are displayed (before start).
Once this is done, you have my thumbs up 👍