Skip to content

Conversation

@pre-commit-ci
Copy link
Contributor

@pre-commit-ci pre-commit-ci bot commented Nov 24, 2025

updates:
- [github.com/astral-sh/ruff-pre-commit: v0.14.5 → v0.14.6](astral-sh/ruff-pre-commit@v0.14.5...v0.14.6)
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 24, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 82.60%. Comparing base (afd93d2) to head (1b07c45).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #589   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   82.60%   82.60%           
=======================================
  Files           9        9           
  Lines        2604     2604           
=======================================
  Hits         2151     2151           
  Misses        453      453           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Nov 24, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #589 will not alter performance

Comparing pre-commit-ci-update-config (1b07c45) with master (afd93d2)

⚠️ Unknown Walltime execution environment detected

Using the Walltime instrument on standard Hosted Runners will lead to inconsistent data.

For the most accurate results, we recommend using CodSpeed Macro Runners: bare-metal machines fine-tuned for performance measurement consistency.

Summary

✅ 106 untouched
⏩ 106 skipped1

Footnotes

  1. 106 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

@hombit hombit merged commit 235f7d1 into master Nov 26, 2025
56 checks passed
@hombit hombit deleted the pre-commit-ci-update-config branch November 26, 2025 16:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants