Skip to content

sauron: add cache and global fetch lock#775

Closed
daywalker90 wants to merge 2 commits into
lightningd:masterfrom
daywalker90:sauron-cache-fetch-lock
Closed

sauron: add cache and global fetch lock#775
daywalker90 wants to merge 2 commits into
lightningd:masterfrom
daywalker90:sauron-cache-fetch-lock

Conversation

@daywalker90
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

In an effort to get the tests passing again i had to either mock the esplora responses or make the plugin and test framework respect esplora's rate limit.

I decided to do the latter and add a global file based cache to reduce requests for the same URL in the cache's TTL.

The global fetch lock is needed for the race condition of same URL requests that happen often during multiple CLN node startups.

Please let me know what you think.

I'm tagging some of the original sauron authors (looking at the commit history):
@darosior @Amperstrand @chrisguida @russnes @ca-ruz @iorch @sip-21

@daywalker90 daywalker90 force-pushed the sauron-cache-fetch-lock branch from a864ed0 to 0e83ded Compare January 19, 2026 14:31
daywalker90 added a commit to daywalker90/plugins that referenced this pull request May 13, 2026
I want to archive the plugin for several reasons, in no particular order:

- tests are failing for all current CLN versions right now
- there is an alternative with passing tests in here called `trustedcoin` that does something similar
- it was a WIP according to the README but there is no progress but my own PR [lightningd#775](lightningd#775) trying to fix things
- i don't feel comfortable merging this without review and there hasn't been any review in 4 months
@daywalker90
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator Author

No review in 4 months so i will be archiving sauron instead: #841

daywalker90 added a commit that referenced this pull request May 13, 2026
I want to archive the plugin for several reasons, in no particular order:

- tests are failing for all current CLN versions right now
- there is an alternative with passing tests in here called `trustedcoin` that does something similar
- it was a WIP according to the README but there is no progress but my own PR [#775](#775) trying to fix things
- i don't feel comfortable merging this without review and there hasn't been any review in 4 months
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant