-
Couldn't load subscription status.
- Fork 115
Channel splicing support #677
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
jkczyz
wants to merge
16
commits into
lightningdevkit:main
Choose a base branch
from
jkczyz:2025-10-splicing
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+626
−68
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
16 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
17a548a
Add funding_txo to ChannelReady event
jkczyz a9c42c6
f - bindings
jkczyz 3ca039a
Add SplicePending and SpiceFailed events
jkczyz 2020151
f - bindings
jkczyz 3a43010
Handle LdkEvent::FundingTransactionReadyForSigning
jkczyz 630d963
f - extract_tx
jkczyz 39e55e9
Refactor funds checking logic into reusable method
jkczyz 0a71c11
Add Node::splice_in method
jkczyz 32c50ce
f - import
jkczyz a2a1c7c
f - fee_estimator clean-up
jkczyz d5e65d3
f - bindings
jkczyz 0258799
Add Node::splice_out method
jkczyz 32236b5
f - fee_estimator clean-up
jkczyz f4083d1
f - bindings
jkczyz d6b619d
Add reject_inbound_splices Config parameter
jkczyz 57ad1c8
Add an integration test for splicing
jkczyz File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
IIUC, contrary to the docs here and in LDK, this flag is necessary to still support downgrades, i.e., forwards, not backwards compatibility (we might want to fix this/make this more clear in the LDK docs).
However, we currently don't support downgrades in LDK Node anyways, so here we can just omit this flag.