Skip to content

cmd/loop: add max swap fee flags for static in#1114

Merged
starius merged 3 commits intolightninglabs:masterfrom
starius:max-fee-rate
Apr 7, 2026
Merged

cmd/loop: add max swap fee flags for static in#1114
starius merged 3 commits intolightninglabs:masterfrom
starius:max-fee-rate

Conversation

@starius
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@starius starius commented Apr 7, 2026

Add --max_swap_fee_sat and --max_swap_fee_ppm flags to loop static in. When set, the resolved cap is checked against the current quote before confirmation and sent in MaxSwapFeeSatoshis instead of the quoted fee, giving scripts a budget ceiling without the quote-then-retry workaround.

Fix #1113

Pull Request Checklist

  • Update release_notes.md if your PR contains major features, breaking changes or bugfixes

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces fee control mechanisms for static address loop-ins. By allowing users to specify maximum swap fees in either absolute satoshis or parts-per-million (PPM), it provides a safer way to manage swap costs without needing manual quote-then-retry workflows. The changes include new CLI flags, robust resolution logic for these caps, and comprehensive unit tests to ensure correct behavior under various scenarios.

Highlights

  • New CLI Flags: Added --max_swap_fee_sat and --max_swap_fee_ppm flags to the 'loop static in' command to allow users to set a budget ceiling for swap fees.
  • Fee Cap Resolution: Implemented logic to resolve the effective maximum swap fee, ensuring that if both flags are provided, the tighter (lower) cap is enforced.
  • Early Validation: Added an early check against the server-provided quote to reject swaps that exceed the user-defined fee caps before confirmation.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces fee capping for static address loop-ins by adding --max_swap_fee_sat and --max_swap_fee_ppm CLI flags. It includes a new utility for resolving the effective fee cap and validating it against server quotes. Feedback focuses on improving the idiomatic use of the math/big package and optimizing the allocation of big integer constants.

Comment thread cmd/loop/feecap.go Outdated
Comment thread cmd/loop/feecap.go
@starius starius marked this pull request as ready for review April 7, 2026 04:02
@starius starius changed the title [WIP] cmd/loop: add max swap fee flags for static in cmd/loop: add max swap fee flags for static in Apr 7, 2026
starius added 3 commits April 6, 2026 23:06
Add resolveMaxSwapFee helper that computes an effective maximum swap fee
from --max_swap_fee_sat and --max_swap_fee_ppm CLI flags. When both are
set the tighter (lower) cap wins. The helper also rejects early if the
server-quoted fee already exceeds the resolved cap.
Add --max_swap_fee_sat and --max_swap_fee_ppm flags to `loop static in`.
When set, the resolved cap is checked against the current quote before
confirmation and sent in MaxSwapFeeSatoshis instead of the quoted fee,
giving scripts a budget ceiling without the quote-then-retry workaround.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@hieblmi hieblmi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice PR, LGTM!

I also checked that there are no further discrepancies between existing RPC fields and exposure in the cli.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@bhandras bhandras left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🎉

@starius starius merged commit 0aab352 into lightninglabs:master Apr 7, 2026
28 of 31 checks passed
@starius starius deleted the max-fee-rate branch April 7, 2026 15:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Expose max fee rate in CLI for static loop in commands

3 participants